Letter: Sleaze-buster

Robert Fallowfield
Monday 12 October 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: On behalf of the board of trustees of the People's Trust I should correct your report "Fayed's pounds 1m anti-sleaze trust closed" (21 September).

There were three key areas of error. The first is that the People's Trust was struck off for non-filing of accounts (these were in fact filed within the legal timetable) but for an administrative oversight which led to the company's annual return not being submitted on time. All administrative errors have now been corrected and we have made formal application to the High Court for the People's Trust to be restored to the register.

Second, the People's Trust is continuing the work which was carried out during the 1997 election campaign. Studies have been commissioned from experts in constitutional law concerning the forthcoming Bill of Rights, reform of the House of Lords and devolution. We are also continuing to give support to individual cases of injustice.

Third, it is not at all the case that Mr Al Fayed has lost interest since the tragic events of August last year, and he remains one of the key supporters of the trust's work.

The comment by a spokesman for the Conservative Party shows that they still cannot distinguish between an administrative oversight and the sort of failings for which their party met its due reward at the hands of the electorate in 1997.

ROBERT FALLOWFIELD

Trustee, The People's Trust

London SW3

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in