Letter: Secular Ireland
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: While generous praise from our British neighbours is always welcome ("A dynamic nation that is a blueprint for modern Britain", 27 November), your leader-writer's comments about Mr De Valera and the Irish Constitution of 1937 are way off the mark.
That constitution is certainly not "inward-looking" or "obscurantist": indeed, the working papers of its drafting committee show that they borrowed hugely from Continental and American constitutional influences. The drafters were liberal, cultured jurists of outstanding quality who constructed an essentially secular document which made a few concessions to traditional Catholic and nationalist values. And, in stark contrast to even a modern- day United Kingdom with its established churches, the Catholic Church was hugely disappointed with the Constitution's meagre reference to its "special position", together with enforceable guarantees of non-endowment, non-discrimination and non-establishment. The reference to the "special position of the Catholic Church" was in any event deleted y a huge majority in a referendum in 1972.
And while Mr De Valera's attitude to women was decidedly old-fashioned, in one of his final speeches before the referendum on the constitution in July 1937, he famously predicted that, if adopted, it would lead, for example, to women becoming President and sitting on the Supreme Court, events which - happily - have subsequently come to pass.
In truth, the Constitution, despite its faults and imperfections, was a far-sighted, avant-garde document which provided for a clear separation of powers, extensive powers of judicial review of legislation and a bill of rights. Proof of the pudding here is that although Ireland was the first country to accept the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights (12 years before the UK), its record before that Court is among the very best. And, as Irish society changes and modernises, those objectionable features of Catholic nationalism with which our Unionist neighbours rightly take issue are being removed, one by one, in the fairest and most democratic way possible - by the referendum process which the constitution made compulsory.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments