Letter: Scots and English
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: David Aaronovitch ("I'm fed up with this myth of superiority spouted by the Scots", 1 September) is right to rehearse the radical tradition in England, and to puncture the conceited claims of blame-the-English Nationalists.
The history of the Union has been one of oppression and exploitation but these have not been carried out by England at the expense of Scotland. The oppressors have been the rich and powerful of both nations, and the exploited are the English and Scottish working classes. The first victims of the money-making machine which became English imperialism were the English and Welsh - the Scots joined them soon afterwards.
After nearly three centuries of shared history, politics, economy and culture, it is undeniable that Scots are British, in the same way that Bavarians are German and Gascons are French. The question is therefore how best to acknowledge Scotland's differences while maintaining its indisputable common British identity. The devolved Scottish Parliament within the Union is a rational way to achieve this end.
The Nationalists' case is based on a fallacious thesis, in that they deny the British side of Scotland's identity. To justify themselves, they are forced into historical and cultural fabrications. The latest of these is that "the Diana stuff" did not happen in Scotland. In fact, in Glasgow this time last year George Square was covered with thousands of bunches of flowers, and in the City Chambers the books of remembrance ran out of space.
Our peoples are too alike to be artificially divided and our island is too small for contrived extra borders.
PETER RUSSELL
Glasgow
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments