Letter: Same old Lords
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter:
Same old Lords
Sir: I read Sarah Schaefer's report "Peers support interim plan for the Lords" (12 May) as my flight flew over Kilimanjaro, on my return from helping to train future women leaders in Tanzania.
It's pretty much business as usual in the Upper House - jobs for the boys. The agreement to permit 92 hereditaries to continue in the new House of Lords means almost certainly at least 90 of them will be males, following centuries of the mind-bogglingly fatuous male primogeniture system.
Put together with the fact that for decades life peerages have been appointed at the rate of seven males to each female, you have yet again a chamber that in no sense contains the width of skills and intelligence the 51 per cent of this nation that happens to be female could bring to it.
TIM SYMONDS
Executive Director
Project Parity
London W1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments