Letter: Russia's woes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The chaos in Russia is not the fault of free markets but of criminal ones. The fundamental problem is therefore political: the state has proved too weak to control its usurping robber-baron business oligarchies.
These ruthless plutocrats seek to blame the economic liberals for the harm caused in fact by their own widespread mafia practices, knowing all the while that discrediting the idea of free markets will consolidate their position as monopolists. Because of a misunderstanding of the nature of free markets, however, we in the West are in danger of being taken in.
A properly functioning system of free markets means that even market leaders are subject to the challenge of competition. But no "capitalist" country has attained such a system without effective legislation restricting monopolies.
In other words there is no such thing as an absolutely free market, and what is conventionally known as one can only exist when appropriate legislation seeks to provide a level playing field.
Similarly the IMF was not wrong in its prescriptions but in lending money with no guarantee that those prescriptions would be followed.
This was again, however, ultimately a political decision, taken to appease Russia as a nuclear power.
In truth Russia has had more leeway with the IMF than any other comparably bankrupt state could have expected.
NICK MARTIN-CLARK
London N17
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments