Letter: Rotten voting
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I share Max Beran's concern at the lack of choice we will have in next year's European elections (Letter, 24 September). He is wrong, however, to attribute the problem to proportional representation.
Achieving a reasonable degree of proportionality by party is important, but it is not the only characteristic we want of our voting systems.
Our aim in reforming the electoral system should be to ensure that those elected better reflect the views of the electorate, and that can only be done by allowing voters to express their preferences for candidates and not just for parties.
The principles of proportionality and voter choice need not conflict. If the Government had chosen the single transferable vote, or even an open list system, for the European elections then both objectives could have been achieved. It is the Government, and not PR, which we must blame for a closed list system which, while offering the advantages of proportionality, denies voters choice.
Fortunately Lord Jenkins' commission has been asked to recommend a system which extends voter choice as well as being broadly proportional, and we are therefore optimistic that the commission will propose something better for Westminster elections.
KEN RITCHIE
Chief Executive
Electoral Reform Society
London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments