Letter: Rewarding teachers

Chris Payne
Friday 09 April 1999 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: When performance-related pay was introduced in the polytechnic where I worked in 1993, we lecturers accurately predicted the names of those of our colleagues who would get it.

They were, to a man, that type of teacher who really doesn't like teaching but who prefers to spend his time administering.

Bad teachers who realise that not only is teaching hard work but that it is also very badly paid with few prospects usually opt for the only career path available to them.

They become cronies of someone in the management and trade hard work in the classroom for paper-pushing and staff-room politics. The pay is better.

Indeed, as a manager, it is possible, under present structures, to earn two or three times as much as a classroom teacher for doing what amounts, often, to little more than clerical work.

The solution is to pay teachers realistic wages to attract good graduates and to develop a cadre of school administrators to handle all the clerical support.

The job-for-life culture should be ended. Teachers should have annual contracts with tenure only awarded after a number of years. Appraisal should not be by the head because this leads to cronyism.

Rather , there should be termly student evaluations. This is the way most European and American schools and colleges are run. They do not have our levels of teacher discontent.

CHRIS PAYNE

Uxbridge,

Middlesex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in