Letter: Religious schools
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Indarjit Singh states (Right of reply, 3 December) that the new Sikh school would teach diversity, not separation. If this is so, why do we need Sikh schools in the first place? Religious schools, by definition, must be exclusive; otherwise there is no rationale for them to exist.
Diversity, unlike separation, is essentially a phenomenon of secular education. Religious schools have neither the ideological foundation nor religious flexibility to accommodate diversity. This is especially true if schools are structured on proselytising religions. In such schools, teaching of diversity is likely to end up merely as an instrument of attracting state funding.
Religious minorities have every right to preserve their religion and culture, as they continue to do by constructing temples and mosques across the country. But state-funding of religious schools is different: it is tantamount to legitimising the "communalis-ation" of education.
RANDHIR SINGH BAINS
Gants Hill, Essex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments