Letter: Race and the police
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Sir: When Jim Callaghan decided that the police should be excluded from the scope of race relations legislation, that inevitably sent a signal to the police that they
were not meant to take race relations seriously.
The Home Secretary is the police authority for the Metropolitan Police district, yet holders of that office are speaking as if they have no personal responsibility for the overall conduct of the Met. Given their general power "to give directions to the Commissioner as to the operational control of the Metropolitan Police", Callaghan's successors could have instructed the Commissioner to tell his officers to behave as if the Race Relations legislation did apply to them - and to cooperate fully with public inquiries.
Did Jack Straw and his predecessors do that? If not, why not?
ERIC THOMPSON
London NW2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments