Letter: Private money
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: John Denham, Minister of for Health, writes of the Private Finance Initiative: "Financial appraisals are used to ensure that schemes are only approved if they offer value for money" (letter, 16 July). What does this amount to?
Value for money is measured by comparing the cost of equivalent outputs being provided by the public sector, using a Treasury model. In the case of the Pimlico School PFI the public sector model sticks to government planning policies and builds around 50 private flats on the playgrounds; meanwhile the PFI bidder proposes 169 flats.
As a result around pounds 10m more is raised by the bidder to help offset the cost of the development, making the deal notionally cheaper - although only by pounds 1m, since the bidder's costs are actually pounds 9m higher than the public sector!
The value for money offered by PFI isn't worth the paper it's written on.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments