Letter: Price of food
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Current thinking on food seems to be based on the premise that food must cost less and less. This has led to: intensive farming, with all its environmental destruction and rural depopulation; ever more supermarkets, destroying village centres and community; the Common Agricultural Policy, with all its distortions of economic reality. And this, when spending on food is already down to only 11 per cent of incomes in Europe. Even in the current CAP reforms, yet further reduction in food costs is cited as an aim.
Yet food, clothing and shelter are the cardinal requirements for life. Only when these are satisfied can any surplus be applied to education, health, cultural life etc. Ask any Third World country. Europeans should regard it as normal to spend say 20-25 per cent of income on food. That could meet the real costs of its production.
NICHOLAS G WRIGLEY
Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments