Letter: Powers to arrest
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Powers to arrest
Sir: I suppose we should cease to be disappointed at the pitifully self- seeking and astonishingly ill-informed reactions from the Police Federation and Association of Magisterial Officers to the proposal to "give private security firms the power to arrest people" in breach of court judgements (report, 24 November).
The magistrates' spokeswoman stressed the superiority of the public sector for enforcing fines. Why? It appears that fines are not being collected now, so why not use the skills of debt-collecting agencies, if this can be done in a cost-effective way?
The Police Federation spokesman argues that "difficult and sometimes violent individuals" can only be successfully dealt with by the police.
He is clearly unfamiliar with the operation of hospital casualty departments on Friday nights, with city centre pubs and clubs at weekends, with benefits agency offices, with almost every public service occupation, in fact.
Understanding and dealing with violence is a skill that can be taught - and not just to the police. When he turns to the "accountability" of those empowered to arrest, recent history is not overwhelmingly on the side of the police! What it does suggest is that there is an urgent need for the Government to introduce state regulation of the security industry.
Finally, he appears to suggest that powers of arrest should remain solely with the police. We all have the right as citizens to make an arrest.
This is, in reality, the power any private security officer exercises when apprehending and detaining a shoplifter, an event that occurs many hundreds of times every day. So what makes this new proposal so mould- breaking?
KEITH HEARNDEN
Loughborough,
Leicestershire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments