Letter: Poor nations left out
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I agree with your leading article (6 December) that the collapse of the World Trade Organisation talks is a missed opportunity for the world's poor. They would indeed have made gains through the talks if industrialised nations had agreed to open their markets to developing-country exports and had tackled the issue of agricultural export subsidies.
As it was, the rich world could not even agree to offer tariff-free access for the exports of the very poorest countries, which account for only a tiny percentage (0.4 per cent) of world trade. Even this would have constituted little more than a modest gesture towards the poorer members by the powerful trading nations that dominate the WTO.
A positive outcome for the world's poor from future negotiations will depend upon developing countries continuing to bargain hard. But in addition, the WTO must change the way it does business, so that the US and EU address the concerns of poor countries, by changing their protectionist policies, to make the international trading system fairer.
This would create the possibility of trade becoming the basis, in the words of your editorial, of "prosperity, security and environmental protection for all" - an outcome that everybody claims to seek.
DAVID BRYER
Director, Oxfam
Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments