Letter: Pinochet's destiny

Janina Macdonald
Monday 26 October 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The events that have been unfolding around the arrest of General Pinochet, not least Lady Thatcher's letter, raise a number of issues that obviously go far deeper than whether or not he should be released. Lady Thatcher pointed out that the Government seems to have double standards, "cosying up" to the Chinese government and then turning around and arresting the general.

Lady Thatcher argued that because General Pinochet supported Britain during the Falklands War, and in doing so helped to save many British lives, we should, in return, ignore or dismiss his past history. Her argument is thus essentially that any country or person who abuses human rights should be excused if they have supported, or promise in some way to support Britain.

Following that, if China agreed to, for example, ensure that Britain continued to have influence in Hong Kong, then Britain in return would ignore the abuses that have been carried out in both China and Tibet and Lady Thatcher could then support Tony Blair as he "cosies up" to China.

If this is the way that Britain is running its foreign policy then perhaps it is time that we took a closer look at the way we relate to other countries. If we are going to continue to assert that we are a democratic nation, one that recognises that all peoples should have access to basic human rights, and use this to justify our intervention in other countries (such as Serbia), then we need to assert this in all cases.

JANINA MACDONALD

London SE5

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in