Letter: Owners of the land

John M. Smith
Monday 08 March 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

LETTER:

Owners of the land

Sir: The readers of Historical Notes on 1 March ("Private property is a public asset too") learned that "landowners have been gradually forced to accept ... public footpaths". This is incorrect for the great areas of Midland England which were subject to Enclosure Acts.

In the case of Flore parish the Act of 1778 made provision for various public and private rights of way, including footpaths "and that it shall not be lawful for any Person or Persons, after the setting out of such new Roads or Ways, to use or claim the Use of any Roads or Ways, either public or private, through the same new Inclosures or Allotments, or any Part thereof, either on Foot or with Horses, Cattle or Carriages".

Though there were some objections to the Enclosure Acts the process was democratic and expensive. The landowners had their say, and often wanted the footpaths to allow their workers to get to work.

No doubt as agriculture declines and the land goes to waste, more liberal access will be legalised. Meanwhile Marion Shoard has no right to roam and should stick to the footpaths. If she wants to go off the paths to get a better photograph she can ask permission.

JOHN M SMITH

Secretary

Flore Heritage Society

Flore, Northamptonshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in