Letter: Only a smack
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Philip Hodson ("Smack addicts", 25 September), uses the tactics one associates with politically correct thinking on the discipline of children. Rule 1: Never use the word "smack", when "hit" has far more resonance. Rule 2: Quote the most outrageous examples. No one who would advocate the right of parents to administer a smack to a child necessarily supports the methods extolled by the Ezzos. Their proposals probably come close to systematic abuse.
There are laws in this country already governing abuse and harm to children. The reaction of Paul Boateng, the health minister, to the European ruling is the only sensible one and, I am sure he will be supported by loving and supportive parents who wish to bring up their children in a civilised manner. To compare smacking to child abuse does no one any favours.
CHRIS RHODES
Faversham, Kent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments