Letter: Off the roads
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article states that congestion charging is a deeply flawed policy that hits the poorest hardest. The poorest motorist may be worst affected by it, but these are not generally the poorest people in society.
The really poor do not own cars. A third of all households do not have a car. They could be the big winners of John Prescott's congestion charging proposals. The money raised from congestion charging would be used to improve walking, cycling and public transport - the modes of transport on which poor people most depend.
And if congestion charging produces the expected fall in traffic levels, it is low-income households which will benefit most from the consequent reduction in noise and pollution, as a disproportionate number of poor people live in the vicinity of main roads.
JOHN STEWART
Joint Co-ordinator Lambeth Public Transport Group
London SW9
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments