Letter: Obstetrics in crisis
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: Obstetrics in crisis
Sir: I am partly if not largely responsible for the apparent surplus of trained specialists in obstetrics and gynaecology, and to some extent those in other specialities (letter, 12 May).
A few years ago there was a surplus of consultant posts over trained applicants in obstetrics and gynaecology in particular, but also in some other specialities. At that time politicians of all the main parties agreed that there was an urgent priority to train sufficient doctors to fill sufficient consultant posts to ensure that we had a consultant-based service. This means that the patient would normally be seen by a consultant or have a consultant in close contact with their care. This entailed a promise to fund sufficient additional consultant posts.
Since then these promises have vanished. The priority seems to be to reduce waiting lists and times, which can be measured, and ignore failures in acute care in general and the labour ward in particular, which are not scored and published. These may result in lost or damaged children.
Previously, because of a shortage of applicants, the "purchasers" removed offered funding for new consultant posts. The only way to avoid a repetition was to trust the politicians' promises and train sufficient doctors to meet an expansion agreed between the profession, the Department of Health and the health authorities. This we did. The promises are not being met; the public is about to lose the result of at least five years of intensive training in doctors not appointed to consultant posts.
Strong public pressure is needed for consultant expansion so that an acceptable level of care is provided, particularly in the labour ward.
JOHN ATKINS FRCOG
Swainby, North Yorkshire
The writer was formerly representative of the Academy of Royal Medical Colleges on the Speciality Workforce Advisory Group.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments