Letter: Nuclear rethink
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter:
Nuclear rethink
Sir: Your report "UN report warns of Earth's unsustainable future" and editorial "A chilling assessment of global warming" (16 September) highlight the many dangers of climate change. As you rightly state, rising seas will cause severe flooding, more diseases and crop failures, and more large-scale "natural disasters".
Cruelly, many of these will be inflicted on those peoples of the world least able to cope.
It is interesting to note that Britain is one of the few countries on course to meet its Kyoto obligations, not least because 30 per cent of UK electricity comes from nuclear energy - an energy source that emits virtually no greenhouse gases.
However, the longer term is less clear, as most of Britain's nuclear power stations are likely to have closed in the next 20 years, creating a huge CO2 gap.
Fulfilling the continuing need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions substantially is very doubtful unless a significant contribution from nuclear energy is maintained.
Your leader questions whether there is enough "political will" to meet the challenge of climate change.
Politicians indeed face a difficult dilemma in squaring the need to curb CO2 emissions with growing energy demand and the need to sustain economies.
But politicians are not the only ones with responsibility here.
Mounting an effective response to the threat of global climate change may require people in positions of influence to rethink certain deep-seated prejudices against nuclear energy.
KEITH PARKER
British Nuclear Industry Forum
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments