Letter: NHS rationing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Fran Abrams' article "Doctors who choose to reject the old" (17 December), told only half the story about institutionalised discrimination against the elderly in the NHS.
For decades there has been collusion between government and the medical profession in rationing care, while maintaining the NHS is the best in the world. Two groups have been particularly easy to deprive, the elderly and the socially disadvantaged. Until recently both groups were grateful for any health care they received and seemed to be unaware they were getting second best. What is geriatrics but a means for rationing care to the elderly?
I would welcome legislation that ended discrimination based on age, but ending ageist apartheid within the NHS would have major financial implications. To pass legislation without the financial wherewithal to implement it would be a cynical charade.
SIMON J ELLIS
Consultant Neurologist
Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments