Letter: NHS merit awards

Professor Humphrey Kay
Wednesday 12 August 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: What can you mean by suggesting that "the abolition of consultants' automatic merit awards should create the scope to offer perhaps larger incentives to those who are truly outstanding" (leading article, 11 August)? To do so would introduce the scale of inequities of the boardroom and barristers' chambers, and would remove the incentives which a modest B or C award can offer to a skilled, hard-working consultant, who must otherwise spend more time in private practice.

And where on earth do you get the concept of "automatic" awards? In my experience recommendations from a hospital or other organisation were only made after much, often organised, discussion and inquiry. It is very difficult to assess clinical merit. One can get useful opinions from fellow consultants, others in the same speciality, from nurses, junior doctors, students and of course patients. But often it is the long-term benefit to patients (after several years perhaps) which is most relevant.

There is a heavy responsibility on those who make recommendations to the awards committee to do so carefully and impartially. There will be failures and it is never going to be easy but it will best be done on as wide a basis of clinical knowledge as possible.

Professor HUMPHREY KAY

Pewsey,

Wiltshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in