Letter: NHS is good value
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Chancellor's populist announcement that money from future increases in tobacco tax will be spent solely on healthcare ("Tobacco duty is ring-fenced for the NHS", 10 November), shows a sad lack of commitment to the principles of good public health.
With a habit as damaging as this, surely prevention should have first call on the rather small sums mentioned - pounds 300m will make little difference to the NHS, but it would transform the tiny (pounds 30m annually) government programme to help smokers give up, not least by increasing the provision of free nicotine patches for the poor.
Any money not needed for this purpose should be allocated to attacking the root cause of smoking among the poorest and least healthy - deprivation and poverty. Since those who are unable to give up will be made even worse off as a result of the increased tax, their families will need all the help they can get.
DONALD REID
Joint Chief Executive, UK Public Health Association
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments