Letter: NHS is good value
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In your leading article of 12 November you welcome expansion of the private sector, in preference to publicly funding the health service. I should be rubbing my hands with glee at this prospect. I am paid about pounds 30 per hour for my contracted 37.5-hour NHS week but I charge five times that for private patients. That rate includes minimal overheads, no need to teach junior staff or medical students and very little paperwork.
Are you still sure you want more private medical care? In case you are, I shall remind you that we have the least expensive health system in the western world. In spite of what you read much of, the care is of a standard at least equal to that obtainable in the USA and Europe. To give you an example, look at the outcomes of neonatal intensive care, which are as good as in any country. In the UK we have the added advantage of knowing we are not undergoing treatment because it is in the pecuniary interest of the doctor.
If this country continues along its present path of decrying everything that is publicly funded, it may well end up with what it will deserve - a ridiculously expensive and wasteful US-style system, such as President Clinton has been failing to control.
We must scotch the idea that modern medicine is a bottomless pit of expense. Take the example again of care of the newborn or maternity services, which are not seriously underfunded. If all areas of medical care were as appropriately funded we would have, once again, an excellent service and still it would be billions cheaper than the USA or European systems.
The central problem we have is a political one. How do we overcome the phobia our main political parties have about spending our money on services we want.
Dr ALASTAIR SCAMMELL
Lincoln
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments