Letter: NHS hard times
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I heartily endorse many of the comments by the president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists ("Royal medical colleges `just cosy clubs' ", 2 December) on the need for the medical royal colleges to stand up and be counted on the question of clinical standards.
I have always believed in professional self-regulation, preferably through critical peer review.
The problem is that the colleges have not been consistent in their approach to issues like regular re-validation through peer review and, even if they had a common position, they do not seem to have teeth to take action against consultants who choose to ignore them.
Perhaps the "teeth" need to be given by the General Medical Council, but the coll-eges do have to agree and set the speciality standards first.
A J VALLANCE-OWEN MBA FRCS Ed
Group Medical Director
Bupa, London WC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments