Letter: Nato too late again
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Just as Nato's Bosnian adventure mirrors Brer Rabbit's briar patch entanglement with the Tar Baby, so there is the curious incident - to paraphrase Sherlock Holmes - of the Nato watchdog that did nothing in the night-time.
Alarm bells should have rung when Albania collapsed into anarchy. Weapons from looted armouries found their way into Kosovo via KLA training camps in northern Albania. When the KLA went on the warpath, common sense and international law dictated that Nato seal Albania's lawless border with Serbia to stem the flow of men and materials to the KLA. Instead, Nato's megaphone "bomb the Serbs" threats emboldened the KLA. Even the world's multi-ethnicists cheered on a Greater Albania, unaware of the contradiction.
The KLA proceeded to control a large swath of Kosovo. Washington quaked at the prospect of negotiating with insurrectionists that were gunning for an all-out solution. The nod was given to Belgrade and Nato's threats subsided. The KLA were quashed, the rural population predictably suffering. Nato quickly resumed its bombing threats, ostensibly for humanitarian reasons but in reality to counter any suggestions that Milosevic had again called Nato's bluff. So much for Nato as the handmaiden of sensible policy.
MISHA SIMIC
Bedford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments