Letter: Mystery candidates
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I have just seen the London voting paper for the European parliamentary election. On a swift count it consists of 11 parties each with 10 candidates, one party with eight candidates and three individuals each ploughing a lonely furrow. In all, 121 hopeful candidates.
But all the information we get about any of them is their names; from which we can hazard a guess at their sex. The only one I have ever heard of is Arthur Scargill. We know not their ages, their qualifications, if any, their views on Europe, the health service or education. There is a wide divergence of opinion within both major parties on all these issues. I may well vote for a candidate who represents my party but is strongly opposed to my own views.
Might there not be some modest financial saving if we gave each party a coloured ball with a number on it, and made this election in law what it is in fact - a lottery.
GRAHAM DON
London E3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments