Letter: Moorland scars

Alasdair Mitchell
Monday 28 September 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your environment correspondent's report about Duncan Davidson's plans to build a network of tracks in the Cheviots ("Moorland scarred by tracks for shooting", 28 September) illustrates an important anomaly. Why is it that farm and forestry tracks do not need full planning permission, unlike those used in connection with grouse shooting?

Heather moorland is a semi-natural environment, though vitally important in terms of biodiversity. The Government's own conservation agencies accept that properly managed grouse shooting is one of the best ways of maintaining and paying for heather moorland. By contrast, over-intensive sheep grazing and inappropriate conifer plantations ruin moorland. Yet landowners have traditionally received subsidies to cover moors in sheep and conifers, whereas they are taxed on shooting. The final irony is that Mr Davidson is reportedly reducing the numbers of sheep in order to regenerate heather.

The officials of Northumberland National Park - who are not exactly popular with local people - should be lobbying the Government to put grouse moor management on a level playing field with sheep rearing and forestry, instead of wringing their hands and whingeing about "difficult decisions".

ALASDAIR MITCHELL

Stocksfield, Northumberland

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in