Letter: Moonshine
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In your obituary of John Archer (14 December), Archer is quoted as saying that he was amazed how closely the operations in the film Destination Moon resembled the Apollo landing.
Really? As I recall, Destination Moon was rather wide of the mark. They had a weight problem, and bedsteads were thrown out of the rocket. Also, was there not a Russian spy aboard? Then again, no TV cameras. After a stroll round the brilliant Bonestell set, the astronauts decided to ring the President on the radio phone.
The most significant technological deviation was to have the lunar vehicle all in one piece - the old silver needle, beloved of science fiction covers. No detachable lunar module.
No, the virtue of Destination Moon was that it was the first movie to deal seriously with the possibilities of a Moon landing. You can't get everything right, either now or then!
BRIAN W ALDISS
Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments