Letter: Misconception
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Deborah Orr needs a bit of help with her theology (Comment, 10 December). When she writes about "that immaculate conception act" of the mother of Jesus, she is mistaking it for the virgin birth. The dogma of the Immaculate Conception was promulgated by the Papacy in l854 and refers to the belief that the Virgin Mary was free from the taint of original sin. Even the faithful sometimes make the same mistake.
The Rev ROD GARNER
Southport, Merseyside
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments