Letter: Mind medicine
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I read, with a depressing absence of surprise, about Jack Straw's knee-jerk reaction to the Michael Stone case ("Doctors 'must improve help' ", 27 October). It seems that our senior ministers think like tabloid journalists and speak in tabloid headlines.
Psychiatrists can only forcibly detain people under the prescriptions of the Mental Health Act. A spokeswoman is quoted in your article as explaining that Michael Stone's disorder is not one covered by this Act. Therefore he could not have been legally compelled to have treatment.
In addition, the mental health system is underfunded, understaffed, and under strain. If we want the system to be able to deal with more than it is currently able to, we must ensure that it has sufficient resources.
And so it seems there are two problems - legislation and funding - both of which are under the control of Mr Straw and not the psychiatrists.
Psychiatry is not a glamorous field of medicine and the profession is more than 1,000 members short because of this and the emotional stresses involved. They deserve our praise, not our derision, especially from senior politicians who should know better.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments