Letter: Medical mistakes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The British Medical Association for many years has applauded the New Zealand system of no-fault compensation, which recognises that (for instance) a child with spasticity of no obvious cause has the same needs as a child with spasticity following a medical mishap, and therefore should have them met (leading article, 21 July; letter, 23 July).
Doctors have not held up the introduction of this into the NHS: politicians have; lawyers have. Your suggestion that trusts and doctors should not dispute cause is incompletely thought out: it does nothing for the people with needs which cannot be traced to an actionable mistake, or indeed for the doctors whose lives are damaged by the adversarial system they fund, out of expenses the state must eventually meet through us.
Dr ADRIAN MIDGLEY
Exeter
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments