Letter: Medical mistakes

Dr Gerard Panting
Monday 26 July 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article "The scandal of medical compensation cases" (Review, 21 July) concludes with a call for all disabled children to have access to specialist therapists without the need to resort to litigation.

The Medical Protection Society has long been an advocate of a ring-fenced, no-fault compensation scheme for victims of profound brain injury.

However, we make the following points.

Where concern is raised about the outcome of medical treatment, patients and/or their representatives are entitled to a clear explanation of what has taken place and full answers to their questions.

We encourage early disclosure of medical records once a reason has been given. Approximately 60 per cent of claims are abandoned once disclosure has been made.

The development of the pre-action protocol as part of the Woolf reforms will expedite resolution. If that fails, under the new civil justice regime it is for the court, not the claimant or defendant, to set the timetable to bring the case to trial.

There is a need to ensure that all patients with profound brain damage receive the help they require, not just a minority who are able to prove that their damage was due to someone else's shortfall in care.

Dr GERARD PANTING

Medical Protection Society

London W1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in