Letter: Lords reform defeat

Earl
Sunday 27 June 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In creating two classes of hereditary peers (those entitled to a seat in Parliament and those deprived of such a right), the Weatherill deal - to retain 92 hereditaries during the interim stage of reform - has turned the Government's House of Lords Bill into a hybrid Bill, ie it can no longer be classified as a public Bill.

Given that the Parliaments Acts of 1911 and 1949 apply to public Bills only, the Government will be unable to force the House of Lords Bill into law if the peers vote it down at the Third Reading next month.

This they must do, since it is the only sane reaction to a government that has demonstrated its lack of both policy and principle in the matter of Lords reform.

EARL OF BURFORD

Hadleigh, Suffolk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in