Letter: Long-term advantages of shareholding

Sean Woods
Wednesday 28 April 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I find it surprising that your investment and business pages consistently report the long-term advantages of shareholding compared with building society accounts, yet when a demutualisation brings about the opportunity to make this change, you seem nostalgically to support mutuality (Outlook, 27 April). Whilst building society interest rates for borrowers and savers are usually more attractive than comparable bank products, this ignores the fact that the benefits should be compared with returns as an investor in the converted bank and, whilst possibly more volatile, recent history has shown that the total returns are considerably better.

SEAN WOODS

London SW12

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in