Letter: Longer at school
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: According to your report "Prep pupils get three times state funding" (8 November), David Hart of the National Association of Head Teachers attributed the performance of independent preparatory schools, compared with state primaries, to their superior resources.
He does not appear to have mentioned the factor which, more than any other, explains why state schools fail to "get the curriculum quart into the current pint timetable": that is shorter teaching time.
The teaching day in most prep schools is one hour longer than the minimum recommended in state primary schools; the prep school teaching year is more than 100 hours longer than the recommended minimum, and at key stage 3 it is 140 hours (or 15 per cent) longer.
DAVID WOODHEAD
National Director, Independent Schools Information Service
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments