Letter: London figurehead
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: London figurehead
Sir: Maria Hellyer already has the option to put "none of the above" on her ballot paper (letter, 16 November). She can spoil it. Deliberately.
Politicians and their parties are never aware of the number of conscientious voters who are dissatisfied by the choice of candidates on offer and who stay away from the polling stations; because they do just that.
If they were to attend their polling stations and deliberately spoil their ballot papers, then their dissatisfaction would certainly be registered.
Spoiled papers are always counted. A small number of spoiled papers is likely to happen in any election. But imagine how seriously politicians and parties would take notice if the number of spoiled papers exceeded the narrow majorities by which some of them are elected.
The numbers would reveal a body of people willing enough to make the journey to the polling booth and to cast a vote, large enough to have caused a different electoral result, and yet unpersuaded to do so.
It might even result in the creation of conscientious politicians who are willing to pay more attention to what their constituents say than what their parties tell them to do.
THOMAS CLEEVE
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments