Letter: Lessons of war
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Roy Hattersley's piece about the poets of the First World War smacks too much of trendy revisionism ("There was no poetry for Uncle Herbert", 11 November).
Consider the tale of Hattersley's Uncle Herbert: a decent man, taken from civilised surroundings, trained to be a killer, then sent to a hell on earth. This happened to millions of others throughout Europe. Such a tragedy merits its own canon of verse.
Why attack the writing of these poems? They represent an attempt (in an age when there was no "counselling") to derive some meaning from the wasteful obscenity of the war. It was an attempt to try and claw something back for humanity.
If all those men had been killed for nothing more than a tract of land, then at least poetry could transform them from ordinary Uncle Herberts to the tragic heroes they were. Can Roy Hattersley not accord them due respect for having been there?
ALUN WILLIAMS
Llanfairpwllgwyngyll, Anglesey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments