Letter: Law Society bar
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The claim made by Channel Four in its publicity material for a forthcoming Dispatches programme, reported by The Independent ("Convicted solicitors free to practise", 2 December), that the Law Society has failed to strike off solicitors who are convicted of criminal offences is factually wrong.
The Law Society cannot be criticised for failing to strike off these solicitors. We energetically prosecute solicitors who break the law before the independent Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, but the decision to strike off is a decision for the tribunal alone. The SDT is independent of the Law Society, and its members are appointed by the Master of the Rolls.
Indeed, the Law Society has successfully appealed to the High Court against tribunal decisions when it has passed a too lenient sentence on a solicitor, leading to solicitors being struck off. The most recent case was just a month ago.
MICHAEL MATHEWS
President
The Law Society,
London WC2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments