Letter: Landmine ban
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: Landmine ban
Sir: Mike Croll is right that mine clearance should be given a much higher priority (Review, 20 August), but he is wrong to regard the campaign to ban landmines as a waste of time. The objective is to reduce the overall number of mines in the ground as quickly as possible, and reducing the rate at which new ones are laid is a vital part of that. It is achieved as much by changing attitudes as by legal process.
True, the campaign has taken more than its share of the money and limelight, but it, and Princess Diana, have put landmines on the political agenda. True also that "the real battle is going to be won by people with sticks and trowels", but they will lose the war without the "PR initiatives and hot air".
BILL LINTON
London N13
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments