Letter: King in a nightie
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The revelation that the shirt which King Charles I is said to have worn to his execution is in fact a lady's nightdress (report, 23 September) does not necessarily meant that it is inauthentic.
Charles I and his courtiers were arguably the most foppish group ever to rule a European state. You only have to look at Van Dyck's portraits. These aristocrats are daintiness personified - magnificently fragile and exquisitely perfumed. They were astonishing aesthetes, too, buying up the masterpieces of European, and especially Italian, painting as if there were no tomorrow.
It is quite logical, therefore, that King Charles I should choose to wear women's clothing on his date with destiny. This revelation is a cause for celebration. In these post-Diana times, the Royal Family should relish the fact that one of their great forebears was a transvestite.
JAMES HALL
London SW11
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments