Letter: Justice for disabled
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Stanley Best's letter (14 May) about deaf people and jury service shows not only regrettable prejudice but a great deal of ignorance about deaf people and the means by which we communicate.
I am profoundly deaf yet, through lip-reading or support such as speech to text transcription (palantype) or sign language interpretation, I have been able to work as managing director of an international bank, establish small businesses, serve on government task forces and run a major national charity.
However, merely due to my deafness I am prohibited from carrying out one of the most basic acts of citizenship, that of jury service. This is insulting and unjust.
Does Stanley Best really believe that deaf people when provided with adequate communication support are unable to understand and comprehend what has occurred in a court?
Far from weakening the fairness of a trial, allowing deaf people to be jurors may strengthen the basis for the jury's decision. In addition to absorbing all the spoken arguments, we as deaf people are of necessity expert at reading facial expression and body language which adds another valuable dimension to the jury's examination of the evidence.
JAMES STRACHAN
Chief Executive
RNID, London EC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments