Sir: So Nuala Scarisbrick in her Right of Reply considers that the right of children "not to be artificially manufactured, bought, sold, frozen, stored, thawed, etc" takes precedent over their right even to exist.
Children certainly have the right to be protected from dogma that would prevent them from being born at all and there is no reason to believe that their chance of leading a happy life is any less than anyone born under different circumstances.
Perhaps we should wait until such children can give us their opinion.
PETER ORGAR
Ashford,
Kent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments