Letter: Is our beef safe?

Chris Clayton
Monday 13 December 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

My recent work focusing on Latino voters in Arizona has shown me how crucial independent journalism is in giving voice to underrepresented communities.

Your support is what allows us to tell these stories, bringing attention to the issues that are often overlooked. Without your contributions, these voices might not be heard.

Every dollar you give helps us continue to shine a light on these critical issues in the run up to the election and beyond

Head shot of Eric Garcia

Eric Garcia

Washington Bureau Chief

Sir: I have dined off British pork and British duck this week, washed down with British cider. I just wish I could give the green light to British beef, once undoubtedly the finest.

So what has gone wrong? The cannibal feed given to cows was only effectively banned in 1996. We eat cows at 30 months old, so the government argument is that this beef will not carry BSE, since it was born after the feed ban. But in 1999 more than 2,000 cows went down with BSE, and it is known from statistical analysis that 14,000 have BSE but are not showing symptoms as yet.

The rate of decrease of disease in the national herd is thought by epidemiologists to be too low for the feed to be the only cause of BSE, bearing in mind the partial feed ban of 1988. So some of the herd looks as though it has endemic BSE.

Medical statisticians will know for sure in 2001, when BSE should not show in further animals born in 1996. If there is BSE then, a grim situation arises because we will know for sure the disease is permanent.

CHRIS CLAYTON

York

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in