Letter: Iraq sanctions

Gabriel Carlyle
Friday 28 August 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: David Usborne reports ("Resignation casts doubt on Iraq weapon inspections", 28 August) that Scott Ritter complained that the Security Council had failed to punish Iraq for its decision to suspend all future co-operation with Unscom until sanctions against Iraq are lifted.

It is difficult to imagine how the Security Council could inflict any more "punishment" on Iraq - having already succeeded in reducing its citizens to penury and stunting an entire generation of Iraqi children.

Mr Ritter's petulant whine that the Council's inaction "constitutes a surrender to the Iraqi leadership" and "makes a mockery of the mission the staff of the special commission have been charged with implementing" merely serves to demonstrate his naivety.

Talk of Iraq's "weapons of mass destruction" is largely for domestic consumption so it should come as little surprise that, when it started to get in the way of a more important objective - namely the indefinite perpetuation of the sanctions regime - the inspection process would be reined in.

GABRIEL CARLYLE

Oxford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in