Letter: In the party lists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Government argues that peers have no democratic mandate to block the European Parliamentary Elections Bill which would establish a closed list electoral system. It can also be argued that the Government has no mandate to introduce it.
There was no manifesto commitment by the Labour Party to change the voting system for election to the European Parliament. There was only a passing reference in their manifesto to support for a proportional system of voting. There is no mention of any party list system, closed or otherwise.
For voters to have known about Labour's commitment to closed lists, they would have had to read the written results of a pact struck during the summer of 1996 by a Lib-Lab committee chaired by Robin Cook and Robert MacLennan. The committee also had no democratic mandate. It was made up of two or three constitutional "experts" and a handful of MPs and peers - all appointed to the committee by party bosses.
In its report the committee binds both Labour and Liberal Democrat Parties to support of a list system. Paradoxically, this same unelected committee concluded that "there is too much power centralised in the hands of too few people, and too little freedom for local communities to decide their own priorities."
JONATHAN BARTLEY
Movement for Christian Democracy
London E16
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments