Letter: In brief

Norman Goalby
Wednesday 07 April 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The tax and benefit system does not exist to subsidise the inefficiency or excess profits of bad employers (Right of Reply, 6 April).

If a competent employer cannot find pounds 3.60 plus costs and adequate profit from an hour of an employee's labour, that job is not economically viable. It should be made viable (by better management or investment) or it should disappear.

We can ignore the crocodile tears of Ruth Lea, head of policy at the Institute of Directors, about job losses.

Since when has the IoD cared about poor people?

It is up to the IoD's members to create decent jobs at decent wages instead of whinging about anything that means less time on the golf course.

NORMAN GOALBY

Montgomery,

Powys

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in