Letter: Hunting the lobster
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Having previously decried speciesism, Paul Rees (letter, 27 July) now seems to admit that all species are not equal, in that vertebrates are more certainly capable of suffering. In this, he has exposed the great flaw in the doctrine of innate animal rights, as opposed to the more pragmatic notion of animal welfare: if the ability to suffer dictates rights, then how and where should we draw the line?
Mr Rees may find that his distinction between vertebrates and invertebrates is based on wishful thinking. I note that Julie Roxburgh, of the Shellfish Network (letter, 27 July) says of lobsters and crabs: "There is at present no process of killing these creatures that does not cause them pain and distress."
I suspect that if shellfish were gathered by specially trained dogs followed by red-faced men on horseback, New Labour might consider a Bill to ban lobster-coursing.
ALASDAIR MITCHELL
Stocksfield, Northumberland
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments