Letter: Hazardous food
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leader-writer's suggestion (8 June) that the Prince of Wales is out of order in giving voice to his concerns about the headlong industrial drive towards genetically engineered foods is hard to credit.
The Prince is doing the country a great favour. Over the past 18 months, research reports by Eurobarometer, ourselves and other independent bodies have pointed repeatedly to the degree of well-justified public anxiety and mistrust that surrounds the political and regulatory framework supposedly surrounding this potentially all-pervasive technology. But the machine rolls on unamended.
Last year, in a study sponsored, to its credit, by Unilever (itself a potential beneficiary of the technology), we found that the panoply of ministerial advisory committees and other regulatory mechanisms is failing utterly to engage with issues of central significance for most people - particularly, the unknowns surrounding future cumulative dependency on genetically engineered crops and foods, with the risks of unforeseen (because unforeseeable in terms of current scientific understanding) synergies and ecological or public health mishaps. We urged major new experiments in public involvement and discussion, to attune government and industry to these apparently unrecognised concerns. So far there has been not a vestige of response.
What does it take to get such concerns taken seriously? Hurrah for the Prince of Wales!
ROBIN GROVE-WHITE
Director Centre for the Study of Environmental Change
Lancaster University
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments