Letter: GM food? No, thanks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Amid the current concern about the safety of food derived from genetically engineered organisms, we should not forget potential environmental effects of this new technology.
Over the past quarter-century, there have been massive declines in the populations of farmland birds in Britain. The causes of these declines are various but centre on ever-increasing intensification of farming methods, driven by the financial environment in which farmers have to operate.
Genetically engineered crops could produce higher yields without damaging wildlife if the technology is used with care; but used indiscriminately they could result in considerable further damage.
Evidence from the US, for example, shows that the use of herbicide-resistant crops results in herbicides being applied to such an extent that weeds, already reduced to tiny numbers by conventional methods, are almost totally eliminated. These weeds and their seeds provide the living for what little wildlife remains on farmland.
Government agencies, such as the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the Ministry of Agriculture, have funded much of the research into farmland bird declines. As a result, both the present government and its predecessor has been able to formulate well-founded policies for reform of the Common Agricultural Policy aimed at benefiting the environment, as well as agriculture and rural communities. It is therefore particularly unfortunate that there is little, if any, research in progress into the environmental impact of genetically engineered crops. Are we once again going to let the agricultural horse bolt from its stable before we discover how to lock the door?
Dr J J D GREENWOOD
Director
British Trust for Ornithology
Thetford, Norfolk
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments