Letter: Gays not warned

Peter Tatchell
Wednesday 05 May 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: While the police deserve praise for their liaison with the lesbian and gay community since the Soho bombing, their failure to forewarn the homosexual public that gay venues could be attacked was a grave error of judgement.

A week before the bomb, police suspected that Old Compton Street might be a target. Accordingly, officers alerted some gay businesses and organisations.

This alert was, unfortunately, badly executed. The gay rights group, Stonewall, was posted a police warning dated 27 April, but this letter did not arrive until 30 April (the day of the bombing). Since the police had serious concerns about the gay community being attacked, why was this warning not phoned or faxed to Stonewall, and to other key gay rights organisations?

It was also a mistake for the police not to use their own community consultation structures to alert the most obvious and important gay groups: those that are involved in police liaison through the London Lesbian & Gay Policing Initiative (LLGPI). None of these organisations received any warning.

The most serious police misjudgement was, by far, the decision to warn some gay bars, but not the wider gay public. Because the police did not issue a public alert about the possibility of gay venues being bombed, most homosexuals did not take the threat seriously. They heard Sir Paul Condon and Jack Straw suggesting an exclusively racist motive for the bombings, and assumed that the gay community was not at risk.

I put it to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner that he should have gone on national television on 27 April to advise the gay community that it was a potential target, and announce publicly that Old Compton Street and other gay districts were under police surveillance. This might have deterred the bomber.

PETER TATCHELL

OutRage!

London SW14

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in